PLA25-060 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Note: An existing system evaluation is required on proposed parcel A to verify the setbacks between the system and any proposed property lines can be met. Proposed Parcel B is OK.” Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: a. A re-plat (in the form of a partition plat) is required, due to the adjustment or elimination of a partition plat parcel line or subdivision lot line. b. Must be platted per ORS 92.050/055, and the plat submitted for review. c. Per ORS 92.055 – Parcels over 10 acres can be unsurveyed. d. Checking fee and recording fees required. e. A current or updated title report must be submitted at the time of review. Marin County Building Inspection commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. It is recommended new property lines be established at least 3 feet from any existing residential structures and/or 10 feet from any existing commercial structures.” Marion County Assessor’s Office provided tax information on the subject properties. All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. 7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. These criteria are as follows: 1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not apply to those lots or parcels. 2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. 3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. The minimum parcel size, as calculated in (A)(1) is 80-acres. Both parcels are smaller than the minimum parcel size, therefore the criterion in (1) and (2) do not apply. This proposal is to consolidate and create parcels more suitable for commercial agriculture by combining the farmable land and reducing the size of the developed parcel. The criterion in (3) is met. 4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger tha n the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; c. Allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an acreage standard; or