PLA25-058 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Public Works Land Development, Engineering, and Permits commented: ENGINEERING ADVISORIES A. An Access Permit will ultimately be required to construct a new driveway connection to Evans Valley Road. B. A mapped seasonal drainage flow way traverses the presumed access path on #14569 Evans Valley Rd. Future development should not block historical drainage. Marion County Septic commented: Condition of Approval: An existing system evaluation is required on proposed parcel A (3.85-acre parcel) Note: An existing system evaluation is required on proposed parcel A to verify the setbacks between the system and any proposed property lines can be met. Proposed Parcel B is OK. All other agencies either did not respond, or stated no objection to the proposal. 6. The criteria for reviewing property line adjustments within an Urban Transition zone are listed in MCC 16.13.310. These criteria are as follows: A. A series partition, subdivision, residential planned development or other residential development of a lot, as the lot existed upon application of the UT zone, that results in the division of land into four or more lots intended to be occupied by dwellings or mobile homes is not permitted in the UT zone. B. The following regulations shall apply when property line adjustments and partitioning of land regulated by Chapter 16.33 MCC, Subdivision and Partition Requirements, are proposed: 1. Additional street right-of-way required by adopted county standards shall be dedicated along the street frontage of any lot 10 acres or less in area that is part of a partition or lot line adjustment. Street and drainage improvements within the dedicated right-of-way shall be deferred until otherwise required by the county, or by the city following annexation. A nonremonstrance agreement for future road or drainage improvements within the right-of-way abutting the lot may be required. Marion County Land Development, Engineering, and Permits did not require any right -of-way dedication or a nonremonstrance agreement as conditions of approval. The criterion does not apply. 2. The location of lot lines shall not significantly reduce feasible options for the future location of urban streets or utility services, or preclude development options on the property or adjacent properties. The proposed property line adjustment will result in the landlocked parcel gaining access to Evans Valley Rd NE. This lot line adjustment will not affect the future of urban streets and amenities. The criterion is met. 3. When a lot occupied by a residence is reduced, or a lot is created to accommodate a new residence allowed in MCC 16.13.320, the lot should be as small as possible and should not be larger than one acre. If a lot of one acre or less is not feasible, the lot should either contain all of the undeveloped land or be large enough that the urban development potential will be a significant incentive for the owner to develop to planned urban uses when the lot is annexed. The configurations of the parcels are not for the purpose of isolating a dwelling, or related to accommodation of a new residence. The resulting lots being reduced or enlarged will still have significant incentive to redevelop at urban densities upon annexation. The criterion is met. 4. When a new or adjusted lot located in a residential plan designation is smaller than five acres and larger than one acre, a redevelopment plan shall be required demonstrating that the lot can accommodate future subdivision development at the median density proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning administrator shall review and approve the redevelopment plan. The redevelopment plan is only for the