Laserfiche WebLink
7. The applicants should contact the Woodburn Fire District to obtain a copy of the District’s Recommended <br />Building Access and Premise Identification regulations and the Marion County Fire Code Applications Guide. <br />Fire District access standards may be more restrictive than County standards. <br /> <br />APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the <br />County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regula- <br />tions the Director must condition or deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the Director's decision may request <br />that the application be considered by a Marion County hearings officer after a public hearing. The applicant may also <br />request reconsideration (one time only and a fee of $200) on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension <br />of the 150 day time limit for review of zoning applications. <br /> <br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Requests for reconsideration, or <br />consideration by a hearings officer, must be in writing (form available from the Planning Division) and received in the <br />Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Road NE, Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on February 25th, 2025. If you have <br />questions about this decision contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective <br />February 26th, 2025, unless further consideration is requested. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which decision was based are noted below. <br /> <br />1. The subject properties are designated Primary Agriculture in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and <br />correspondingly zoned EFU (Exclusive Farm Use. The primary intent of both this designation and zone is to <br />promote and protect commercial agricultural operations. <br /> <br />2. The properties are located east of Arbor Grove Rd NE, west of Sleepy Hollow Rd NE, and north of Crosby Rd <br />NE. They are bounded to the north by an undeveloped right-of-way extending from Sleepy Hollow to Arbor <br />Grove. The 14.42-acre parcel addressed 7901 Sleepy Hollow Rd NE appears as Lot 2 of block 3 on a plat for <br />Loganville recorded in 1926. It was conveyed as such to the current owners in 1972 and is therefore a legal lot for <br />land use purposes. <br /> <br /> The original application was to adjust the 14.42-acre parcel with a 34.65-acre tax lot, which after deed research <br />turned out to be tax lot of a larger 105.83-acre parcel that itself consists of ten different tax lots, which are not all <br />under the same ownership. In 1994 there was an approved lot line adjustment and conditional use application <br />which was intended to remedy this configuration. The result of that proposal would have been a 131-acre parcel, <br />connected to farmland east of Case Creek under the same ownership. The land under different ownership, within <br />the 105.83-acre parcel would have been isolated as a 4.92-acre remnant parcel to the northwest. The conditions of <br />approval required for realizing this application (LLA/CU94-012) were never completed. LLA/CU94-012 was <br />itself a repeat of a previous attempt in 1993 to remedy the same unlawful configuration of lots. A summary of the <br />history of that 1993 case is included below: <br /> <br /> Quoted from P/LLA/CU93-049: <br /> <br /> “The Subject 116-acre parcel has a long history of land use actions. In 1979 under Partitioning Case 79- <br />89 Patrick and Dolores Johnston were granted approval to divide a second dwelling with one acre from <br />the original 117-acre ownership. The dwelling located at 17914 Arbor Grove Road was retained with the <br />116-acre parcel as a farm dwelling. In this decision the applicants were advised that any future request for <br />a second dwelling would be looked upon with disfavor due to the separation of the second dwelling. <br /> <br /> In 1981 under Conditional Use 81-89 Patrick Johnston applied for a second dwelling for farm help. This <br />request was denied due to the previous partitioning and the warning that was given [in P79-89]. The <br />proposed second dwelling was proposed to be located at the same site as the illegal dwelling that <br />currently exists at 7881 Sleepy Hollow Road. <br /> <br /> Patrick Johnston failed to record the map separating the 1-acre parcel approved in P79-089. As a result, in <br />1984 Patrick Johnston reapplied to partition the 1-acre and the dwelling from the 117-acre parcel. This <br />request was approved. <br /> <br /> Between 1982 and 1992 Patrick Johnston transferred all but the 4.87-acre parcel to other owners without <br />any land use approvals. Mr. Johnston claims that he believed that his prior attorney had done everything <br />proper with the transferring of these tracts of land, Mr. Johnston does not explain his failure to obtain