Laserfiche WebLink
6. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. <br /> <br />Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: <br /> <br />1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). <br />2. Properties 10 acres or less must be surveyed per ORS 92.060 (7) and the survey submitted for review. <br />3. Survey checking fee required at the time of review. <br />4. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS <br />92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “No Building Inspection concerns with proposed property line adjustment <br />as the proposal relates to structures subject to the state building code” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels in the proposal are larger than the 80-acre minimum parcel size for the EFU zone. <br />Therefore this criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels in the proposal are larger than the 80-acre minimum parcel size for the EFU zone. <br />Therefore this criterion does not apply <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The proposed property line adjustment would reconfigure the subject parcels into a configuration that more <br />accurately and efficiently allows the existing farm uses to continue because it relocates a property line that currently <br />goes through an existing greenhouse structure and locates the property line through the open driving lanes between <br />the structures. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />The only parcel involved in this proposal that is vacant (without a dwelling) is tax lot 700, and that lot would not <br />be increased to a size required to qualify for a dwelling. The criterion is met. <br />