Laserfiche WebLink
(Exhibit 1). Mr. Klopfenstein does not charge for the mulch, and indicates the mulch is <br />provided as service to the agricultural community. However, the lack of cost it is not <br />considered as a significant factor in determining the "essential" nature of the mulch. <br />The Affidavits do not establish in the record that the mulch is "essential" or that other <br />alternatives could not be used. Opponents establish that mulch has many non -farm or <br />residential uses. <br />There is insufficient evidence to establish that mulch is essential to the practice of <br />agriculture with particularity, and the criterion is not met. <br />MCC 17.136.060(A) <br />8. In addition to the specific criteria above, the proposal must also satisfy the conditional use <br />criteria in MCC 17.136.060(A). Those requirements are: <br />(a) The use will not_force a significant change in, or .significantly increase the cost of, <br />accepted farm or forest practices on surrounding lands devoted to farm or.forest <br />use. Land devoted to./arm or.forest use does not include farm or forest use on lots <br />or parcels upon which anon -farm or non forest dwelling has been approved and <br />established, in exception areas approved under ORS 197.732, or in an <br />acknowledged urban growth boundary. <br />Marion County Code 17.136.060(A) outlines the Farm Impacts Test to evaluate whether a <br />proposed conditional use within an Exclusive Farm Use zone will adversely affect existing <br />agricultural operations. <br />Applicant claims that the proposed commercial use would not force a significant change in <br />accepted agricultural practices in the local area because the location is on a portion of the <br />parcel that was not previously dedicated to farming. Applicant states that the traffic impact <br />will be limited as debris will be picked up and dropped off on an as -needed basis, and the <br />use will be confined to the roughly 1.5-acre area identified on the site plan. Applicant also <br />claims the site has been in commercial use for "many years." While this last claim is not <br />substantiated by aerial imagery even as recent as 2021, the other three claims are generally <br />substantiated by the available imagery and description of the business process in the <br />application. <br />The proposed use as a site for commercial mulch generation brings has the potential to <br />introduce tree diseases or insect pests into the local area that could significantly damage <br />local agricultural operations (such as the hazelnut orchard on the adjacent western <br />property) by acting as an introduction point and breeding ground for diseases and pests on <br />a property where the impacted adjacent farmers cannot apply their fungicides or pesticides <br />to combat these threats. While the level of pest introduction is not simple to predict, the <br />proposed activity is capable of critically damaging the economic viability and force a <br />change in local farming practices through the introduction of new pests or diseases that <br />destroy crops grown in the local area. <br />CU 24-028 - ORDER <br />Klopfenstein <br />Page 15 <br />Page 20 of 26 <br />