Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A <br />approval could address the concerns if the Application could satisfy all other criteria. It is <br />possible that this criterion could be met as conditioned. <br />(b) Adequate fire protection and other rural services are, or will be, available when <br />the use is established. <br />The Marion County No. 1 Fire District provides the subject parcel with fire protection <br />services and provided comments with their requirements for meeting fire safety code. Other <br />rural services such as a well and septic are already present on site and the Marion County <br />Sheriff provides police services to the site. All other necessary rural services are either <br />present or will be available when the use is established. The criterion is or could be met <br />with the requirements of the Marion County No. 1 Fire District made a condition of <br />approval. <br />(c) The use will not have a significant adverse impact on watersheds, groundwater, <br />fish and wildlife habitat, soil and slope stability, air and water quality. <br />The proposed activity is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on watersheds, <br />groundwater, fish and wildlife habitat, soil and slope stability or water quality, as the <br />activity would be contained to the roughly 1.5-acre area proposed on the site plan. Air <br />quality is a concern, as the proposed use will be conducted out in the open and the dust <br />from the mulching activity can reduce air quality in the local area. Applicant states that <br />they use a watering truck during the mulching activity to prevent dust and small wood <br />particles from escaping the property, which sufficiently addresses air quality concerns. <br />Mr. Adelman has serious concerns about dust or other airborne particulate matter which he <br />indicates could have a significant impact on his farming practices. However, it is likely <br />that these concerns could be addressed with conditions of approval, and the criterion could <br />be met. <br />(d) Any noise associated with the use will not have a significant adverse impact on <br />nearby land uses. <br />Applicant states that the actual mulching of the woody debris occurs on a limited basis. <br />Applicant states that the actual grinding happens approximately 4 times a year, and the <br />grinding does not occur in the summer to mitigate fire risk. Applicant states that the actual <br />time for grinding is 40-60 hours per year. Applicant states that in addition to the actual <br />grinding, other activities would generate typical noise from trucks and tractors. Applicant <br />states that the vegetative screening that can be made a condition of approval to mitigate the <br />concerns of Opponents and that the condition of approval will reduce the impact of noise <br />on nearby land uses. <br />Opponents argue that the grinding is "extremely loud with major impacts to surrounding <br />farm uses" and that the noise is in the dangerous category. Steve Adelman argues that the <br />level of noise far exceeds what is expected in an agricultural area and cannot be mitigated <br />by the conditions of approval. <br />CU 24-028 - ORDER <br />Klopfenstein <br />Page 9 <br />