Laserfiche WebLink
C. Transportation System Development Charges (SDCs) & Parks fee will be assessed upon application for <br />building permits for new dwellings. <br />D. Utility extension work in the public right-of-way requires permits from PW Engineering. <br /> <br /> Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: <br /> -Per ORS 92.055 – Parcels over 10 acres can be unsurveyed, if outside of an urban growth boundary. <br /> -Parcels ten acres and less must be surveyed and monumented. <br /> -Per ORS 92.050, plat must be submitted for review. <br /> -Checking fee and recording fees required. <br /> - A current or updated title report must be submitted at the time of review. Title reports shall be no more <br />than 15 days old at the time of approval of the plat by the Surveyor’s Office, which may require <br />additional updated reports. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “No Building Inspection concerns with proposed partition. Permit(s) are <br />required to be obtained prior to development of structures and/or utilities installation on private property.” <br /> <br /> Marion County Septic commented: “Proposed parcel 1 requires a site evaluation prior to partition sign off. <br />Proposed parcel 2 is OK.” <br /> <br /> Marion County Tax Assessor provided information about taxes on the subject parcels. <br /> <br /> All other agencies contacted stated no objections to the proposal or failed to respond. <br /> <br />6. Under provisions in ORS 195.300 to ORS 195.336 (Measure 49) the State of Oregon issued Final Order and <br />Home Site Authorization E132803 for the subject property. Section III the order states: <br /> <br /> “Based on analysis above, the claimant qualifies for up to two home sites. However, the number of lots, parcels or <br />dwellings that a claimant may establish pursuant to a home site authorization is reduced by the number of lots, <br />parcels or dwellings currently in existence on the Measure 37 claim property and any contiguous property under <br />the same ownership according to the methodology stated in Section 6(2)(b) and 6(3) of Measure 49. <br /> <br /> Based on the documentation provided by the claimant and Marion County, the Measure 37 claim property <br />includes one lot or parcel and no dwellings. There is no contiguous property under the same ownership. <br />Therefore, the two home site approvals the claimants qualify for under Section 6 of Measure 49 will allow the <br />claimant to establish up one additional lot or parcel and up to two dwellings on the Measure 37 claim property. <br /> <br />7. The applicant proposes to implement the Measure 49 order by establishing one new additional parcel, with one <br />dwelling on the new parcel, and one dwelling on the remnant parcel, all within the area of subject tax lot 800 of <br />the Measure 37 claim. <br /> <br />8. Under provisions in order E134132, Section IV Home Site Authorization, the claimant qualifies for two homesite <br />approvals subject to the following terms: <br /> <br />1. Each dwelling must be on a separate lot or parcel. and must be contained within the property on which <br />the claimant is eligible for Measure 49 relief. The establishment of a land division or dwelling based on <br />this home site authorization must comply with all applicable standards governing the siting or <br />development of the land division or dwelling. However, those standards must not be applied in a manner <br />that prohibits the establishment of the land division or dwelling, unless the standards are reasonably <br />necessary to avoid or abate a nuisance, to protect public health or safety, or to carry our federal law. <br /> <br /> The subject tax lot 800 was approved for two dwellings and one additional parcel. The proposed partition will <br />create the required parcel to allow each dwelling to be placed on a separate parcel. The criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 2. This home site authorization will not authorize the establishment of a land division or dwelling in <br />violation of a land use regulation described in ORS 195.305(3) or in violation of any other law that is not <br />a land use regulation as defined by ORS 195.300(14). <br /> <br /> There is no evidence that the proposed parcels and dwellings will violate a land use regulation or other regulation <br />as described in ORS 195.305(3) and ORS 195.300(14). The criterion is met. <br />