Laserfiche WebLink
6. The applicants should contact the Marion County No. 1 Fire District to obtain a copy of the District’s <br />Recommended Building Access and Premise Identification regulations and the Marion County Fire Code <br />Applications Guide. Fire District access standards may be more restrictive than County standards. <br /> <br />APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the <br />County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regula- <br />tions the Director must condition or deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the Director's decision may request <br />that the application be considered by a Marion County hearings officer after a public hearing. The applicant may also <br />request reconsideration (one time only and a fee of $200) on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension <br />of the 150-day time limit for review of zoning applications. <br /> <br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Requests for reconsideration, or <br />consideration by a hearings officer, must be in writing (form available from the Planning Division) and received in the <br />Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Road NE, Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on August 14, 2025. If you have <br />questions about this decision contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective <br />August 15th, 2025, unless further consideration is requested. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which decision was based are noted below. <br /> <br />1. The subject properties are designated Primary Agriculture in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and <br />correspondingly zoned EFU (Exclusive Farm Use. The primary intent of both this designation and zone is to <br />promote and protect commercial agricultural operations. <br /> <br />2. The properties are located at the curve in the road where 72nd Ave NE turns into Linnet St NE. The lots form a <br />flag lot shape from this curve, going north roughly 830 feet from that road connection to the main body of the two <br />lots. The subject properties are one tax lot that contains two separate lots. One of the two lots consists of the <br />access “flagpole” of this flag lot configuration, which is about 0.54-acres, and the second of the two lots <br />comprises the “flag” portion of the tax lot and is about 20.11-acres. The 20.11-acre lot contains a 2006 dwelling, 2 <br />silos in an area dedicated to farm equipment storage and staging, farm fields dedicated to row crops and a <br />hazelnut orchard, and finally a canal separates the southeastern corner of the lot from the rest of the property. A <br />review of the deed history of the parcel found that 20.11-acre parcel and 0.54-acre parcel were both described on <br />a deed dated February 21, 1955 (Vol 479, Page 158), however these descriptions appeared to indicate that they <br />were separate parcels. Later, the 20.11-acre parcel was described independently in a deed dated January 22nd, <br />1966 (Vol 642, Page 383) when the property was sold to Elmer R. Klopfenstein. Since that date, all subsequent <br />deeds have described the 20.11-acre parcel without including the 0.54-acre parcel in the description. As such, the <br />two parcels are separate, legal lots and are therefore legal for land use purposes. <br /> <br />3. Adjacent properties are entirely zoned EFU and are all engaged in commercial agriculture as farm fields. <br /> <br />4. Soil Survey for Marion County, Oregon, indicates approximately 100% of the soils on the subject tax lots are <br />classified as high value. <br /> <br />5. The applicants are proposing to adjust the property lines on a 20.11-acre parcel and a 0.54-acre parcel to create a <br />3.42-acre parcel and a 17.23-acre parcel. The proposal would place the existing dwelling and a portion of the <br />hazelnut orchard on the smaller parcel and the rest of the farm fields plus the existing driveway on the larger <br />parcel. The proposal would also create an access easement allowing the dwelling to use the existing driveway <br />access connecting to 72nd Ave NE. <br /> <br />6. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment: <br /> <br />Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: <br /> <br />1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). <br />2. Properties 10 acres or less must be surveyed per ORS 92.060 (7) and the survey submitted for review. <br />3. Survey checking fee required at the time of review.