Laserfiche WebLink
on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension of the 150-day time limit for review of zoning applicat- <br />ions. <br /> <br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Appeals must be in writing (form <br />available from the Planning Division) and received in the Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Rd. NE, <br />Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on August 11th, 2025. If you have questions about this decision contact the Planning Division at <br />(503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective August 12th, 2025, unless appealed. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. <br /> <br />l. The subject properties are designated Primary Agriculture in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and <br /> correspondingly zoned EFU (Exclusive Farm Use). The purpose of the EFU zone is to provide areas for <br /> continued practice of commercial agriculture. These areas are generally well suited for large-scale farming. <br /> The EFU zone is also intended to allow other uses that are compatible with agricultural activities, to protect <br /> forests, scenic resources and fish and wildlife habitat, and to maintain and improve the quality of air, water <br /> and land resources of the county. <br /> <br />2. The property is located on the north side of Mt. Angel Gervais Road, approximately one mile east of its <br />intersection with Miller Road. The subject parcel contains a micro plant nursery business approved as a <br />commercial use in conjunction with agriculture. The parcel was most recently the subject of a land use case, V25- <br />006, and is legal for land use purposes. <br /> <br />3. Surrounding properties in the immediate vicinity are all dedicated to commercial agriculture operations as farm <br />fields and farming related residences. <br /> <br />4. The applicant is proposing a variance to the 20-foot minimum setback for a solar array on an accessory carport <br />structure to 1-foot. This is following an approval of a variance to these setbacks for the same structures granted by <br />V25-006. The original application for that variance did not include a request to vary the setbacks to the west <br />property line and the need to include a setback variance to the west property line was only realized after the <br />appeal period for V25-006 closed. <br /> <br />6. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “If the proposed PV solar array is to be installed onto carport structures, <br />then permits(s) are required to be obtained prior to either installation on an existing carport structure, OR, prior to <br />development of carport structure(s) on private property. If the proposed PV solar array is standalone, <br />freestanding, and not part of another structure regulated by the state building code, then a structural permit is not <br />required according to 2022 OSSC 101.2.1. Separate electrical permit(s) are required to be obtained prior to <br />installation. Discussion with a building plans examiner is recommended to accurately determine structural <br />permitting requirements.” <br /> <br />Marion County Septic commented: “Setbacks to the septic system including septic tank, drainfield, and effluent <br />line must be maintained.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />7. In order to obtain a variance the proposal must meet the criteria in found in Section 17.122.020 of the Marion <br />County Rural Zone Code (MCC). These criteria are: <br /> <br />(a) There are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships or practical difficulties which can be relieved only by <br />modifying the literal requirements of the ordinance; and <br /> <br />The parcel is limited in size at 2.55-acres and the parking area where the proposed parking covers (with attached <br />solar panels) are intended to serve is already established and cannot be relocated because the nursery takes up <br />most of the central part of the parcel. Establishing the covers closer to the western property line would match with <br />the existing development. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />(b) There are unusual circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, or use referred to in the <br />application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land, buildings, or uses in the