ZCCPAR25-001 HO Recommendation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The parcel is served by the Stayton Fire District, Marion County Sheriffs Office, has a public road providing access and will be served by a well and septic system. The criterion is met. D. The other lands in the county already designated for the proposed use are either unavailable or not as well suited for the anticipated uses due to location, size or other factors; and While the applicant is not proposing a specific use that needs to be located on the subject parcel, the applicant seeks to better align the present and future use of the parcel with its zoning. The applicant has no intentions to farm the property and would rather continue its commercial timber production use, which better suits the size and topography of the parcel. The criterion is met. E. If the proposed zone allows uses more intensive than uses in other zones appropriate for the land use designation, the new zone will not allow uses that would significantly adversely affect allowed uses on adjacent properties zoned for less intensive uses. The new zone does not allow uses that are more intensive, rather it allows a combination of the same uses of the EFU zone with some added timber uses, which are already present on the site. By applying the FT zone to the property, there will be a benefit for the long term management of timber use. The new zone will better align the zoning with the present and future use of the parcel. The criterion is met. TEMPLATE TEST 5. According to Chapter 17.139.030(B) of the Marion County Code (MCC) a single-family dwelling subject to the special use and siting requirements in MCC 17.139.070 may be allowed provided: (a) The tract on which the dwelling will be sited does not include a dwelling. "Tract " means all contiguous lands in the same ownership. A tract shall not be considered to consist of less than the required acreage because it is crossed by a public road or waterway. The subject parcel is owned by Jerome P. Lackner. Mr. Lackner does not own any other contiguous lands and there is not a dwelling on the subject property. The criterion is met. (b) If the lot or parcel on which the dwelling will be sited was part of a tract on January /, 2019, no dwelling existed on the tract on that date, and no dwelling exists or has been approved on another lot or parcel that was part of the tract. The other lots or parcels in the tract cannot be used to justify another forest dwelling. Evidence must be provided that covenants, conditions and restrictions have been recorded with the county clerk oj' the county or counties where the property is located for any other lot or parcel within the subject tract. The Applicant owned the lot in 2019 and was not a part of any tract. There was no dwelling on the subject property in 2019 either. The criterion is met. (c) The lot or parcel is: ZC / CP / AR 25-001 — RECOMMENDATION Jerome P. Lackner Page 12