My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PLA25-016 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2025
>
Property Line Adjustment
>
PLA25-016 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 12:57:20 PM
Creation date
6/11/2025 12:58:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
25-016
Document_Date
6/11/2025
Land Use Type
Property Line Adjustment
Tax_Lot_Number
071W040001700
Document_Type
Application
Site_Address
4372 BRUSH CREEK DR NE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />Marion County Building Department commented: “No Building Inspection concerns with property line <br />adjustment. Prior to construction of a lean-to onto an existing shop building, a permit may be required to be <br />obtained. Discussion with a county building plans examiner to determine permitting needs is recommended prior <br />to beginning of construction.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />Neither of the two subject parcels are above the minimum parcel size of 80-acres for the EFU zone and the none of <br />the resultant parcels would be brought over 80-acres by this proposal. The criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels are over 80-acres in size nor will be made over 80-acres but less than the minimum <br />parcel size for the area. This criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The 1-acre portion of the subject 18.50-acre parcel being transferred by this proposal is developed with a large barn <br />accessory structure and is separated from the portion of the property being used as a commercial farm field by the <br />driveway accessing the dwelling site at 4372 Brush Creek Dr NE (the dwelling located on tax lot 1500). While the <br />open space around the structure could be utilized as part of a farming operation, it would not be realistic to say it <br />can be easily incorporated with the rest of the fields on the 18.50-acre parcel. Practically speaking, it would be used <br />on its own for implement storage or new farm buildings based on the location and existing infrastructure on the <br />parcels. As such, the transfer would not impact the overall potential to farm the parcels and leave them in a state <br />where they are just as suitable for commercial agriculture as before. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />Both subject parcels currently contain a dwelling, so there are no vacant parcels that could be qualified for a dwelling <br />via this proposal. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting <br />vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size <br />required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.