My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permit - 1283449
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
93-XXXXX
>
Permit - 1283449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2010 2:17:30 PM
Creation date
9/3/2003 3:54:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
100 DETROIT AV
Permit City
Detroit
Permit Number
93-03272
Permit Type
Permit
Permit Doc Type
Permit Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AQUA TEST, INC. <br /> <br />1526 SE Nehalem <br />Portland. OR 97202 <br />Fax (503) 230.1882 <br />(503) 230-~ 185 <br /> <br />July 23, 1993 <br /> <br />Joe Petrovich, R.S, <br />Department of Environmental Quality <br />Willamette Valley region <br />750 Front St., N.E., Suite 120 <br />Salem, OR 97310 <br /> <br />Re: Korner Post Eatery Temporary Repair Plan <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Petrovich: <br /> <br />It is apparent that some form of secondary sewage treatment will be necessary <br />for long term waste water management for this food service facility, The <br />proposal to incorporate (gravelless) chamber leach field technology is not <br />dir_e_c_tl_y_ part of the first phase of the repair proposal. <br /> <br />The existing seepage trenches average twenty-four (24) inches of soil cover. <br />The idea was to take advantage of the biology and permeability of [he soil <br />within twelve (12) inche,~ of ground level as additional area for effluent <br />storage, treatment and disposal. The secondary treatment apparatus would be <br />constructed at an elevation compatible with the elevated disposal trench, <br />discharging a higher quality of effluent into this zone. A WPCF permit will <br />become necessary with the second phase of repair. To attempt any such <br />improvements later with the existing disposal field would be most difficult <br />and costly if even feasible at a/l. Noting that this is a repair, is there not some <br />flexibility in considering alternatives for soil absorption of treated effluent? <br /> <br />At this point in time the cost of the WPCF permit requirement appears to be <br />counter productive to resolving a chronic problem. With all due respect, I <br />would ask for reconsideration for the reasons outlined and in the interest of <br />moving forward toward a solution to the immediate problem. The alternative <br />wouJd be to fill the new trenches with additional drainrock to an elevation <br />within twelve (112) inches of finished grade. If you have any questions or <br />would like to discuss this further, please feel welcome to contact me. <br /> <br />D'a-niel 19IVBush, R.S. <br />Aqua Test, Oregon <br /> <br />Darlene Mann, Korner Post Eatery <br />Lee Grimes, Marion County <br />City of Detroit <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.