My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PV25-012 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2025
>
Partition
>
PV25-012 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2025 3:17:18 PM
Creation date
5/27/2025 3:17:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
25-012
Document_Date
5/27/2025
Land Use Type
Partition
Tax_Lot_Number
092W06B003900
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
9461 DONALD LN SE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As elaborated under criterion #1 above, the applicants were required as a condition of approval for SUB21-002 <br />(Condition #3B) to close all direct access to Cloverdale Rd and consolidate traffic from the development onto <br />Donald Ln. In comments received by staff from Marion County LDEP for this application, they remained <br />consistent, noting a requirement for the development is to ensure all access is off Donald Ln. Due to this specific <br />requirement by Marion County LDEP, there is a specific, unusual condition that applies to this site which <br />necessitates a variance to the specific standard outlined under MCC 17.110.800. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. The degree of variance from the standard is the minimum necessary to permit development of the <br />property for the proposed use; and <br /> <br />The applicants are requesting to vary the standard by 1 parcel, which is the minimum possible. The criterion is <br />met. <br /> <br />4. The variance will not have a significant adverse affect on property or improvements in the neighborhood <br />of the subject property; and <br /> <br />The applicant states that the proposed additional lot will have a minimal impact on the property and access <br />easement improvements because the proposed additional lot is the closest to the connection of Donald Ln to <br />Cloverdale Dr. As such, the people accessing this parcel will cross the least amount of Donald Ln, meaning their <br />trips will impact the improved easement surface less than the other lots. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to <br />develop the property with a single-family dwelling, which is unlikely to generate traffic, pollution, or other <br />disturbances that would constitute a significant adverse affect, assuming typical residential levels. Therefore, the <br />criterion is met. <br /> <br />5. The variance will not have a significant adverse affect upon the health or safety of persons working or <br />residing in the vicinity; and <br /> <br />Similar to the criterion section above, the addition of one single-family dwelling accessing off Donald Ln is <br />unlikely to significantly impact the health and safety of persons working or residing in the vicinity, as the <br />proposed use is to develop the lot with a dwelling. The reasonably anticipated levels traffic, pollution, or other <br />threats to health and safety generated by a single-family dwelling are minimal assuming the development <br />complies with all relevant safety and engineering standards. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />6. The variance will maintain the intent and purpose of the provision being varied. <br /> <br />The intent and purpose of the provision limiting the number of dwellings that take access to a public street off a <br />private road easement is primarily for safety. Since private road easements are not maintained by the County, the <br />quality of the surfacing, repairs, or clearing of obstructions is the responsibility of those subject to the easement <br />agreement. In this situation, the applicants’ proposal increases the number of dwellings utilizing Donald Ln by <br />one dwelling. As addressed in the preceding two criteria, the additional dwelling is unlikely to create a safety <br />hazard through increased degradation of the private road improvements or through the impacts that a single <br />family dwelling is reasonably anticipated to generate. Therefore, the proposed variance still maintains the purpose <br />and intent of the provision. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />9. Based on the above findings, the proposed partition complies with the applicable criteria and is, therefore, <br />APPROVED. <br /> <br /> <br />Brandon Reich Date: May 27th, 2025 <br />Planning Director/Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />If you have any questions regarding this decision contact Alexander Seifer at (503) 588-5038 <br /> <br />Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must <br />promptly be forwarded to the purchaser. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.