My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AR25-007 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2025
>
Administrative Review
>
AR25-007 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2025 12:49:04 PM
Creation date
5/5/2025 12:49:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
25-007
Document_Date
5/5/2025
Land Use Type
Administrative Review
Tax_Lot_Number
092W280000400
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
092W280000400
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marion County hearings officer. The applicant may also request reconsideration (one time only and a $200.00 fee) on the <br />basis of new information subject to signing an extension of the 150-day time limit for review of zoning applications. <br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Appeals must be in writing (form available <br />from the Planning Division) and received in the Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Rd. NE, Salem by 5:00 <br />p.m. on May 20th, 2025. If you have questions about this decision, contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the <br />office. This decision is effective May 21st, 2025, unless appealed. <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. <br />1. The subject tract is designated Primary Agriculture in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and zoned Exclusive <br />Farm Use (EFU). <br />2. The subject tract is comprised of two tax lots located directly northwest of Marion Rd SE, approximately ¾ miles <br />northeast of the intersection of Marion Rd SE and Stayton Rd SE. Tax lot 100 is contains 62.48-acres of flat land in <br />active farm use with Marion Creek running through the southern portion of the property. It contains a single-family <br />dwelling built in 1870 and has multiple farm buildings. Tax lot 400 is .92-acres and consists of flat, bare land. <br />3. Tax lot 400 (the parcel to be developed) was described in 1973 (Vol. 751 Page 142) and has not changed its <br />configuration since. It was also the subject of land use cases M05-047 and CU96-085, both of which were denied non- <br />farm dwellings. Tax lot 100 was described in 1958 (Vol. 508 Page 330) and has not changed its configuration since. <br />The entire tract is therefore legal for land use purposes. <br />4. Surrounding properties consist of large parcels involved in farm operations with a few containing dwellings; all are <br />zoned EFU. <br />5. The applicants propose a secondary farm dwelling for a family members who are principally engaged in operating the <br />farm. <br />6. According to Marion County Soil Survey, the subject tract consists of 99.9% high value soils. <br />7. Various agencies were contacted with request for comments: <br />Marion County Building Inspection commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. Permit(s) are required to be <br />obtained prior to development of structures and/or utilities installation on private property.” <br /> <br />Marion County Septic commented: “A Septic Site Evaluation is required to demonstrate septic viability for the proposed <br />action.” <br />Public Works Land Development and Engineering Permits (LDEP) requested that the following be included in the <br />land use decision. <br />Requirements <br />A. At the time of application for building permits, an Access Permit will be required to document legal <br />access off the public R/W. The existing main access shall be shared between both residences. It will be <br />required to pave the driveway approach for a distance of 20 feet back with hot mix asphalt on account of <br />what will be two dwellings plus commercial farm activity, and to close the adjacent secondary access to <br />the north that will become redundant once the new internal driveway is put in. <br />B. Transportation System Development Charges (TSDCs) and Parks fee will be assessed at the time of <br />application for building permits. <br />C. Utility service extensions such as electric power originating within the public right-of-way require a <br />permit from MCPW Engineering. <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.