My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CU25-019 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2025
>
Conditional Use
>
CU25-019 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2025 1:21:31 PM
Creation date
5/3/2025 1:22:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
25-019
Document_Date
5/3/2025
Land Use Type
Conditional Use
Tax_Lot_Number
041W04C001300
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
22902 SCHULTZ RD NE AURORA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marion County Code Enforcement submitted comments explaining that they support the approval of the <br />application if the paving equipment is kept off site. <br /> <br />Friends of French Prairie commented: “Regarding the application for Conditional Use referenced above on EFU <br />land located at 22902 Schultz Rd NE in Marion County, Friends of French Prairie applauds the Applicants’ <br />decision to seek this permit in order to come into compliance with County Code in order to operate a nursery <br />stock and landscape contracting business. <br /> <br />We support the application with the following comments and expectations: <br />1. Given the intent to separating the paving business from the landscape/nursery business, a specific <br />timeline be established for off-site relocation of the paving equipment. <br />2. To minimize potential adverse impactions on watersheds and groundwater a corresponding timeline be <br />established for removal of the piled waste asphalt and/or road material from the property. <br />3. Given the existence both of a residence and a farm building on this 3.10 acre property, that no <br />additional building related to the conduct of the landscape/nursery business will be erected. <br /> <br />We concur that the application is consistent with the farm impact test as described, the operation of a landscape <br />contracting business as a conditional use, and that it will not have adverse impacts on traffic or local farming <br />practices.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br /> <br />5. The applicant is proposing to operate a landscape contracting business, as defined in ORS 671.520, in conjunction <br />with the growing and marketing of nursery stock that constitutes farm use as stated in MCC 17.136.050(D)(6). <br /> <br />The applicant provided information that shows they meet the definition of a landscape contracting business <br />described in ORS 671.520. Prior to this application, the applicant was storing paving related equipment on the <br />subject parcel and as an aspect of the landscaping business which led to a code enforcement complaint. The <br />applicant has stated they are dividing the business up and moving the paving related equipment to a new location. <br />The subject parcel will therefore be utilized for the growth of nursery stock, the storing of landscaping equipment, <br />and the assembly and dispatch of employees. The application statement attests that there are currently four <br />employees of the landscaping business. <br /> <br />The applicant asserts that they will comply with the requirement for the growth of nursery stock in conjunction <br />with operation of the landscape business. Continued compliance with this requirement will be confirmed through <br />future site visits. Conditions of approval will be applied to maintain compliance with other applicable criteria. <br />Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the conditional use described in MCC 17.136.050(D)(6). <br /> <br />6. The following criteria found in MCC 17.136.060(A) apply to all conditional uses in the EFU zone. <br /> <br />1. The use will not force a significant change in, or significantly increase the cost of, accepted farm or forest <br />practices on surrounding lands devoted to farm or forest use. Land devoted to farm or forest use does not <br />include farm or forest use on lots or parcels upon which a non-farm or non-forest dwelling has been approved <br />and established, in exception areas approved under ORS 197.732, or in an acknowledged urban growth <br />boundary. <br /> <br />This criterion implements ORS 215.296(1), otherwise known as the “Farm Impacts Test”. Due to recent <br />updates to that statute, the Farm Impacts Test is addressed in the following section (7) of this staff decision. As <br />per the findings in that section, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />2. Adequate fire protection and other rural services are, or will be, available when the use is established. <br /> <br />The property is located within the Aurora Fire District and served by Marion County Sheriff’s Office. A well <br />with pump on the property exists as a water source to the existing dwelling. Portable toilets are utilized for the <br />employees of the business. Marion County septic indicated in their comments that a septic authorization will
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.