Laserfiche WebLink
6. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment: <br /> <br /> Woodburn Fire District commented: “Please provide measurements for the gate and fire access width and <br />turnaround for fire apparatus. Please provide additional information on any building on the premise and any other <br />hazard activity to determine the required fire flow.” <br /> <br /> The applicant reached out to the Woodburn Fire District to address some of these initial comments. Afterwards <br />the Woodburn Fire District provided additional comments: <br /> <br /> “We met the morning of 4/28/2025 with Mr. Sanchez (at) the property. We asked that access lane be 20’ wide and <br />to clear an area for fire apparatus turn around. Additionally, he will widen the access crossing over the railroad. <br />Nothing further at this time.” <br /> <br /> City of Woodburn Community Development commented: “The City has no concerns related to the new additional <br />use in this location. We echo the concerns of Woodburn Fire District regarding fire access. Additionally, we <br />advise that appropriate rail authorities be consulted regarding the existing rail crossing to ensure compliance.” <br /> <br />Public Works Land Development and Engineering Permits (LDEP) requested that the following be included in the <br />land use decision. <br /> <br /> Conditions: <br /> <br />Condition A – Prior to establishment of the business on the subject property, under an Access Permit from <br />MCPW Engineering pave the Front Street driveway approach with hot mix asphalt for a distance of 20 feet <br />measured from the roadway edge of pavement. <br /> <br />Condition B – Prior to establishment of the business on the subject property, provide evidence of an <br />agreement with or waiver from UPRR as to the intended use of the existing private rail crossing. <br /> <br /> Requirements: <br /> <br />Requirement A – Transportation System Development Charges (SDCs) will be assessed upon application <br />for building permits or agricultural exemption for the proposed pole barn. <br /> <br /> Marion County Building commented: “Permit(s) are required to be obtained prior to development of structure(s) <br />and/or utilities on private property. If any structure is proposed to be open to the public for potential sales of <br />product, additional code requirements, such as accessibility and restrooms, may be required. Discussion with a <br />building plans examiner is recommended prior to making application for structural permit(s).” <br /> <br /> Marion County Septic commented: “A site evaluation for this property was approved to serve a 5BDRM single <br />family dwelling under permit number 555-24-000108. No septic system currently exists on-site. To proceed with <br />installation, a construction installation permit, including a full proposal outlining number of employees, if restrooms <br />are available to the public, etc. is required.” <br /> <br />All other commenting agencies stated no objection to the proposal. <br /> <br />7. MCC 17.136.050 (D)(6) allows a landscape contracting business, as defined in ORS 671.520, or a business <br />providing landscape architecture services, as described in ORS 671.318, if the business is pursued in conjunction <br />with the growing and marketing of nursery stock on the land that constitutes farm use. <br /> <br /> The applicant is proposing to operate a landscape contracting business, as defined in ORS 671.520, or a business <br />providing landscape architecture services, as described in ORS 671.318, providing services such as mowing and <br />planting of decorative plants. The applicant’s proposed operation meets the definition of a landscape contracting <br />business. <br />