PLA25-005 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Marion County Building Inspection commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. Permit(s) would be required to be obtained prior to development and/or utilities installation on private property, if anticipated.” Marion County Septic commented: “An easement reversal is required since a drainfield easement will no longer be needed due to the movement of the property line to encompass the drainfield onto the property for which it serves.” Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. All contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. 7. The criteria for reviewing property line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. These criteria are as follows: 1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not apply to those lots or parcels. Both parcels are smaller than the minimum parcel size. The criteria do not apply. 2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. The minimum parcel size has been determined to be 80 acres. The criterion does not apply. 3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. Although the larger parcel is losing 1.5 acres to the smaller parcel, it will gain essential agricultural structures and a well with water rights, enhancing the farm’s efficiency now and in the future. The criterion is met. 4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; c. Allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an acreage standard; or d. Adjust a property line that resulted from a subdivision or partition authorized by a Measure 49 waiver so that any lawfully established unit of land affected by the property line adjustment is larger than the size granted by the waiver. Both subject parcels are smaller than the minimum parcel size, and neither parcel will exceed this minimum. Therefore, the criteria do not apply.