Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Appeals must be in writing (form <br />available from the Planning Division) and received in the Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Rd. NE, <br />Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on March 16th, 2025. If you have questions about this decision contact the Planning Division at (503) <br />588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective March 17th, 2025, unless appealed. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. <br /> <br />l. The subject properties are designated Special Agriculture and are subsequently zoned SA (Special Agriculture). <br />Areas with this zoning are characterized by a mixture of small, specialized farms and large commercial farm <br />operations. The primary intent of the zone is to allow for flexibility in management of resource zones . <br /> <br />2. The property is located at 6140 State St, on the southwest side of the intersection between State St SE and 62 nd <br />Ave SE. The property contains a dwelling, several residential accessory structures and structures related to both a <br />nursery and landscaping business, and a fiber optic repeater site in the northwest corner of the property. There are <br />two previous land use cases on the subject property; AR91-007, which approved the fiber optic repeater facility, <br />and CU15-024, which approved the landscape contracting business in conjunction with a nursery. The parcel has <br />not changed its configuration since CU15 -024 was approved and is therefore legal for land use purposes. <br /> <br />3. Surrounding properties in the area are mostly designated as resource zones. To the north and east, most of the <br />surrounding parcels are zoned EFU (exclusive farm use) and are currently engaged in commercial agriculture. To <br />the south and west are more parcels zoned SA with a mix of farm fields and small acreage homesites not engaged <br />in commercial agriculture. Of note, there are some I (industrial) zoned lots along the north side of State St SE, the <br />closest of which is 600 feet from the subject property. <br /> <br />4. The applicant is requesting a variance which would reduce the standard property line setback of 20 feet to 14 feet <br />from the east property line, which abuts 62 nd Ave, to allow construction of a living room onto the existing <br />dwelling. <br /> <br />5. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. <br /> <br /> Marion County Building commented : “No Building Inspection concerns. Permit(s) are required to be obtained <br />prior to any development of structures and/or utilities installation on private property.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to proposal . <br /> <br />6. In order to obtain a variance the proposal must meet the criteria in found in Section 17.122.020 of the Marion <br />County Rural Zone Code (MCC). These criteria are: <br /> <br />(a) There are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships or practi cal difficulties which can be relieved only by <br />modifying the literal requirements of the ordinance; and <br /> <br />The proposal to adjust the property line setbacks is to allow an addition to be built off the east side of the existing <br />dwelling. The applicant’s claim is that other options for placing an addition would be significantly more <br />expensive or are already developed with more permanent features (in-ground pool). <br /> <br />(b) There are unusual circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, or use referred to in the <br />application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land, buildings, or uses in the <br />same zone; however, nonconforming land uses or structures in the vicinity or violations of land use <br />regulations or standards on the subject property shall not in themselves consti tute such circumstances or <br />conditions; and <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to put an addition onto an existing dwelling that was constructed prior to the adoption <br />of planning and zoning ordinances by Marion County. The standards being adjusted were implemented after the <br />dwelling was first constructed, so it was not sited in such a way that accounted for these new codes. The foresight <br />of constructing the dwelling in such a way to allow for new additions to be easily accommodated with modern