My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FP24-007 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
Old Cases
>
2024
>
FP24-007 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 9:13:28 AM
Creation date
1/22/2025 9:14:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
24-007
Document_Date
1/22/2025
Land Use Type
FloodPlain
Tax_Lot_Number
042W01D000300
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
8089 Champoeg Rd NE, Aurora
Additional Info
042W01D00100;0200
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. Tanks shall be constructed with electrical, mechanical, and other service facilities located and <br />installed so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions <br />of the base flood. <br /> <br /> The applicant explains that two above-ground propane tanks will be installed by Ferrelgas on concrete <br />pads designed by a civil engineer and anchored by Ferrelgas. Provision of this engineer certification to <br />Marion County Planning shall be a condition of approval. <br /> <br />13. Wet-floodproofing of the restroom facility requires a Variance to MCC 17.178.060(C) Nonresidential <br />Development, and therefore must meet the criteria of MCC 17.178.090. Variances shall only be issued upon a <br />showing that: <br /> <br /> 1. There is a good and sufficient cause; <br /> <br />Dry floodproofing the entire structure would be significantly difficult. The standard construction of public <br />restroom facilities utilizes water resistant materials, and increasing the standards of these materials to <br />meet wet-floodproofing requirements will be significantly more cost effective than dry-floodproofing the <br />structure. The criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 2. Failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; <br /> <br />Failure to grant the variance would require the applicant to utilize fill, or complex construction that could <br />cause conflicts with other building standards, especially regarding ADA (American’s with Disabilities <br />Act) standards for access of the structure. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. The granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, <br />extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict <br />with existing local laws; <br /> <br />The applicant has already performed a preliminary analysis showing that the entire project, including the <br />restroom facility, will not increase flood heights or velocity of floodwaters. No additional threats to public <br />safety will be created because the structure will not be utilized during flooding when the park will be <br />closed. The criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 4. The variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief; <br /> <br />The applicant plans to dry-floodproof a section of the structure utilized for storage and accessible only by <br />employees. The only areas of the structure planned to be wet-floodproofed are the restrooms which will <br />feature toilets and showers. The criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 5. The variance will be consistent with the intent and purpose of the provision being varied; <br /> <br />Wet-floodproofing the structure will protect the structure itself from damage resulting from periodic <br />inundation of water. Wet-floodproofing the proposed structure can be done in a way that is consistent <br />with the purpose of the floodplain overlay zone to promote the public health, safety and general welfare to <br />minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions. Engineer certification of the design, and the <br />building permit process, will help ensure that the wet-floodproofing of the restroom facility is consistent <br />with the intent of the floodplain criteria. The criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 6. There has not been a previous land use action approved on the basis that variances would not be <br />allowed; <br /> <br /> There has not been a previous land use action approved on this basis. The criterion is met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.