My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOC ORDER
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
Old Cases
>
2024
>
BOC ORDER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2024 1:41:58 PM
Creation date
12/13/2024 9:41:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
CU24-006
Document_Date
12/12/2024
Land Use Type
Conditional Use
Tax_Lot_Number
083W07B000800
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
3300 BLOCK OF LITTLE HAVEN LANE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the effective setback from the northern parcel will end up being at least 130-feet. The primary <br />safety zone is 30 feet around all structures, with some slope related extensions that may affect this <br />property depending on the siting of the proposed dwelling. The secondary fuel break area is 100- <br />feet around the primary safety zone. The secondary fuel break area requires pruned and spaced <br />vegetation so that fire would not spread between the crowns of trees, or between trees via <br />vegetation between them. <br />To reduce the setback of the northern parcel below 130ft would conflict with the criteria of <br />17.137.070(A)(3)(d) and 17.137.070(13)(3) due to the requirements to meet the primary and <br />secondary fuel break areas. <br />A reduced special setback of 130-feet from the northern property line, and 100-feet fi•om the <br />western and southern property lines for the proposed dwelling and any future accessory structures <br />would maintain the intent of the Special Setback Code and meet the criteria in subsection <br />(A)(3)(a-d). The special setbacks do not apply to the eastern property line adjacent to parcels in <br />the AR zone. These criteria are met. <br />4. The special setback in subsection (A)(l) gf this section shall not be applied in a <br />manner that prohibits dwellings approved pursuant to ORS 195.300 through 195.336 mot - <br />should the special setback in subsection (4)(1) gfthis section prohibit a claimanl's <br />applicalion for honresites under ORS 195.300 through 195.336. <br />The proposed dwelling is not subject to/a part of a Measure 37 or 49 claim. The criterion does <br />not apply. <br />(B) Fire Hazard Reduction. As a condition gl'upproval for cony tnor7-farm dtir�ellirng located <br />closer than 200 feet to limber, the own- shall be required to provide continuing fire <br />hazard management in accordance wish Chapter- 3 gf "Fire Safety Consideration for <br />Development in Forested Area, " 1978, and arty revisions thereto. <br />The updated version of the standards within the document above is referenced in the <br />EFU-equivalent of this section of code: 17.136.070 (B). "Fire Hazard Reduction. As a <br />condition ol'approval for any non -farm dwelling located closer than 200-feet to timber, <br />the owner shall be required to maintain a primary and secondary fuel -free break area in <br />accordance with the provision in "Recommended Fire Siting Standards for Dwellings and <br />Structures and Fire Safety Design Standards for Roads" dated March 1, 1991, and <br />published by the Oregon Department of Forestry." <br />The property north of the subject parcel has approximately 10-acres devoted to timber <br />production directly adjacent to the subject parcel. The primary and secondary fuel -free <br />break areas shall be conditions of approval. The criterion is met. <br />(C) Prior to issuance of any residential building permit for ern approved rnon.farm dwelling <br />under AICC 17.136. 050(4), evidence shall be provided theft the courtly assessor* has <br />cisqualified the lot or parcel,fin• valuation at trite cash value forfarnn o•fo-est use; and <br />that the additional lax or penalty has been imposed, if any is applicable, as provided by <br />ORS 308A.113 or 308A.724 or 321.359(l)(b), 321.8g2(l)(A) and 321.716. A parcel that <br />has been disqualified under this section shall not r•equalif fow special assessment unless, <br />when combinl with another contiguous parcel, it constitutes a qual �ffing parcel. <br />The criterion can be met with a condition of approval: the applicant shall submit evidence <br />to Marion County Planning that the property has been disqualified from farm/forest <br />CU 24-006 — ORDER <br />Joy M. Blackman Revocable Living Trust <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.