BOC ORDER - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The proposed dwelling would be built within an existing cluster of residences, accessed on private lane that serves adjacent AR zoned parcels. The proposed dwelling site would be shielded by trees and topography from adjacent SA zoned parcels. These adjacent parcels while involved in timber use, do not appear to be involved in agricultural uses. The access and isolation of the proposed dwelling shield it from the scattered agricultural use of Christmas tree production in the area. The parcels in the study area involved in row crop production are all on the other side of residential neighborhoods from the subject parcel, so it is unreasonable to say that the proposed dwelling will have any effect on those farming operations. The proposed dwelling will not make it more difficult for the few existing farming activities to continue and would not materially alter the land use stability of the area. The criterion of MCC 17.137.060(B)(3) are met. 17. In addition, non -farm dwellings shall be subject to the following code as provided for in 17.137.070, Non -farm dwelling requirements: (A) Special Setbacks. 1. Dwellings. A special dwelling setback of 200 feel from any abutting parcel in farm use or timber production is required. 2. Accessory Buildings. A special setback of 100 feet is required for buildings accessory to a dwelling from any abutting parcel in farm use or timber production. 3. Adjustments. The special setbacks in subsections (A)(1) and (2) of this section may be reduced if it is determined, concurrently with any land use application or as provided in Chapter 17.116 MCC, that a lesser setback will meet the following review criteria for alternative sites: a. The site will have the least impact on nearby or adjoining forest or agricultural lands. b. The site ensures that adverse impacts on forest operations and accepted farming practices on the tract will be minimized. c. The amount of agricultural and forestlands used to site access roads, service corridors, the dwelling and structures is minimized. d. The risks associated with wildfire are minimized. Applicant proposes reducing the setbacks from 200-feet to 100-feet considering the dimensions of the property (an imperfect square of approximately 500 by 500-feet) and the significant slopes which create geohazard areas across much of the eastern, western, and southern sides of the parcel. The most reasonable buildable area is the middle of the northernmost third of the parcel. This area is closest to where the easement enters the property and is the flattest area, though still within the geohazard 2-point overlay. This site would put the proposed dwelling potentially 100- feet from the timber lot directly north -adjacent to the subject property. The applicant would have to sign a farm/forest declaratory statement as a condition of approval, in which they would recognize these timber uses are a priority above a non -farm dwelling in this zone and shall not be interfered with or complained about. The proposed location would allow for the existing easement to be used, which would travel over AR zoned land that is not being used for agricultural or timber purposes. The subject parcel is served by the Salem Suburban Fire District and will comply with all relevant fire district code imposed by the SSFD. It is generally considered prudent to have 2-acres to be able to site a dwelling, septic tank and drainfield, replacement drainfield area, and a well. If the 200-foot setbacks were imposed, the practical buildable area would be roughly a quarter of an acre. The buildable area increases to almost 1-acre with the proposed 100-foot setbacks. The prohibitive geohazard slopes present on