My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
Old Cases
>
2024
>
P24-014
>
Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2024 2:17:14 PM
Creation date
11/22/2024 2:18:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
24-014
Document_Date
11/22/2024
Land Use Type
Partition
Tax_Lot_Number
093W10D002600
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
Account ID 536251Tax Lot: 093W10D002600
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Condition C – Prior to plat approval provide a notarized Road Maintenance Agreement (RMA) for South View <br />Loop. <br /> <br />“Marion County is able to prepare an RMA at no charge, aside from County Clerk recording fees.” <br /> <br />ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />D. All vehicular access shall be derived from South View Loop. <br /> <br />E. Transportation System Development & Parks charges will be assessed upon application for building permits. <br /> <br />Marion County Survey commented: <br /> <br />1) Parcels ten acres and less must be surveyed and monumented <br />2) Per ORS 92.050, plat must be submitted for review. <br />3) Checking fee and recording fees required <br />4) A title report must be submitted at the time of review. Title reports shall be no more than 15 days old <br />at the time of approval of the plat by the Surveyor’s Office, which may require additional updated <br />reports. <br /> <br />Marion County Septic commented: “Both Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 require site evaluations.” <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “Permit(s) are required to be obtained prior to structures development <br />and/or utilities installation on private property. Based on the contours provided in the site plans included with the <br />application, it appears steep slopes are present, which may require an engineered design for retaining walls or <br />other foundation system to support new structures.” <br /> <br />Jefferson Fire District commented: “CASE #: Partition 24-014 currently meets access standards for Jefferson Fire <br />District, when structures are planned to be built the FD will need to review the plans for water supply and access.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to proposal. <br /> <br />6. Chapter 17.181 MCC establishes provisions for partitioning property in an SGO zone. In the SGO zone, <br /> creating a parcel less than five acres in size requires the applicants to submit a “Hydrology Review” meeting the <br /> provisions listed in MCC 17.181. The review indicates that there is a sustainable long-term supply of ground <br /> water for the proposed development. However, the County requires a Declaratory Statement be recorded with the <br /> property deed. This notifies the applicant and subsequent owners that there may be long term groundwater supply <br /> problems and that the County is not responsible for deepening or replacing wells. The County also requires <br /> submission of static water level measurements prior to recording the plat for all existing wells, and prior to <br /> building permits for all undeveloped parcels. <br /> <br />7. There are no specific approval criteria for partitions in the AR zone. MCC 17.128.070 requires a minimum lot <br />size of two acres and the new parcels are consistent with this standard. Subsequently, the proposal meets the <br />criteria for partitioning in the AR zone. <br /> <br />8. Chapter 17.128.050 MCC establishes special siting standards for dwellings near resource zones: <br /> <br />(a) Any new dwelling in an AR zone shall be required to maintain a special setback from any parcel in the <br />EFU, SA, FT, or TC zones when necessary to minimize potential conflicts with farm or forest uses. A <br />100-foot setback is the standard adjacent to farm use and 200 feet is the standard adjacent to forest uses. <br />(b) The owner of a proposed dwelling to be located within 500 feet of the EFU, SA, FT, TC zones shall be <br />required to concur in the filing of the Declaratory Statement prescribed in the respective resource zone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.