FP24-006 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. The variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief; Considering the purpose of the structure, approval of wet-floodproofing plans is the only way to allow the proposed structure to be used as required by the applicant. The criterion is met. 5. The variance will be consistent with the intent and purpose of the provision being varied; Wet-floodproofing the structure will protect the structure itself from damage resulting from periodic inundation of water. Plans provided during the building permit process for the proposed storage system layout, quantities and categories of materials, storage methods, materials use, and processes within the building for fire and life safety concerns will help ensure that private losses are not incurred and public health, safety and general welfare are minimized. Elevating or dry floodproofing the structure would be consistent with the purpose of the overlay, but render the proposed use extremely difficult or impossible on the subject parcel. Wet-floodproofing the proposed structure can be done in a way that is consistent with the purpose of the floodplain overlay zone to promote the public health, safety and general welfare to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions. The criterion is met. 6. There has not been a previous land use action approved on the basis that variances would not be allowed; There has not been a previous land use action approved on the basis that variances on this property would not be allowed. The criterion is met. 7. The new construction or substantial improvement is not within any designated regulatory floodway, or if located in a floodway, no increase in base flood discharge will result; and The proposal is not within a designated regulatory floodway, the criterion does not apply. 8. Variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use; provided, that the criteria of this subsection are met, and the structure or other development is protected by methods that will minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. The proposed structure is not a functionally dependent use. The criterion does not apply. 11. Based on the above findings, it has been determined that the proposal satisfies all applicable criteria and is, therefore, APPROVED. Brandon Reich Date: November 15, 2024 Planning Director/Zoning Administrator If you have any questions regarding this decision contact John Speckman at (503) 588-5038 Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must promptly be forwarded to the purchaser.