Staff Decision (4583) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

determination will be made as to whether the hardship permit is still necessary for the care of the aged or infirm person(s). 4. Notice of a medically necessary absence may be submitted by the owner(s), aged or infirm person(s), caregiver(s) of the aged or infirm person(s), or other agent of the aged or infirm person(s). 5. Caregivers may not be charged any rent or otherwise required to provide financial compensation to live in the hardship dwelling during a temporary absence or medically necessary absence. If as a part of any agreement to provide caretaking services, the caregiver was required to provide financial compensation or incur a financial obligation in order to reside within the hardship dwelling then that arrangement will not violate this subsection (E)(5); provided, that the arrangement existed prior to the temporary absence or medically necessary absence. These were part of the conditions of approval from the previous hardship approval. All conditions of approval from CU03-029 are still in effect. The criteria are met. F. Extended absence from the property by the aged or infirm person(s), or caregiver(s) when the hardship permit dwelling is only being inhabited by caregiver(s), creates a rebuttable presumption that the hardship permit is no longer necessary to provide care to the aged or infirm person(s). 1. Extended absence from the property may result in revocation of the hardship permit; issuance of a citation pursuant to MCC 1.25.030; and/or initiation of civil action in circuit court pursuant to MCC 1.25.050. 2. Notice will be provided to the owner of any substantiated violation of this subsection (F) 30 days prior to the effective date of a revocation of the hardship permit made pursuant to subsection (F)(1) of this section. These were part of the original conditions of approval for CU03-029. These conditions of approval are still in effect. The criterion is met. G. A mobile home or recreational vehicle being used as a hardship dwelling shall to the extent permitted by the nature of the property and existing development: 1. Be located as near as possible to other residences on the property; The applicant is proposing to change the occupant of an existing hardship dwelling already established on the property. The location met the requirements for a medical hardship in the previous land use case CU03-029. The criterion is met. 2. On EFU, SA, FT and TC zoned property, be located on the portion of the property that is least suitable for farm or forest use, if it is not feasible to locate it near an existing residence; The medical hardship dwelling already exists on the property and is not proposed to be moved. Keeping the dwelling in the current location would not adversely impact farm or forest use. The criterion is met. 3. Not require new driveway access to the street; No new driveway access is proposed, and the existing hardship will use its approved access from CU03-029. The criterion is met. 4. Be connected to the existing wastewater disposal system if feasible. The disposal system shall be approved by the county sanitarian. This was a part of the conditions of approval for the original temporary medical hardship in case CU03-029. These conditions of approval remain in effect. The criterion is met.