My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Decision (4575)
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
Old Cases
>
Staff Decision (4575)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 8:21:45 AM
Creation date
10/30/2024 4:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
24-035
Document_Date
10/29/2024
Land Use Type
Property Line Adjustment
Tax_Lot_Number
083W360000600
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
2685 HANNEMAN LN SE
Additional Info
083W360001400
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4) Property line adjustment deeds shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS <br />92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />Turner Fire District commented on the fire access standards. Their comments can be found in the case file. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. Permit(s) are required to be obtained <br />prior to development and/or utilities installation on private property.” <br /> <br />Marion County Septic commented: “An existing system evaluation is required on the proposed 7.08-acre parcel to <br />determine system location and that all proposed setbacks can be met. Per the provided plot plan, an easement for <br />the existing system may be required.” <br /> <br /> All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an SA zone are listed in Chapter 17.137.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />None of the lots or parcels involved in the proposal are larger than the minimum parcel size of 80 -acres nor will <br />any be brought above 80-acres as a result of the proposal. The criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />None of the lots or parcels involved in the proposal are larger than 80-acres or will be brought up above 80-acres <br />by the proposal. The criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The applicants are proposing the adjustment to allow for farm equipment access to the top of the ridge. This will <br />increase the ability of the larger parcel owned by Willamette Valley Vineyards to be operated as part of a farming <br />operation. As a side benefit, the other applicants will be able to expand their driveway access to the house. The <br />criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting <br />vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger tha n the minimum tract size <br />required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.