Staff Decision (4564) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

10. The campground shall be devoted to overnight temporary use for vacation, recreation, or emergency purposes, but not for residential purposes. Overnight temporary use in the same campground by a camper shall not exceed a total of 30 days during any consecutive six-month period. 11. Separate sewer, water or electric service hook-ups shall not be provided to individual campsites. 12. The applicant shall maintain sufficient trash services to ensure all waste is removed regularly. 13. The use shall significantly conform to the site plan submitted with the proposal. Minor variations are permitted upon review and approval of the Planning Director. 14. Failure to continuously comply with the conditions of approval may result in this approval being revoked. Any revocation could be appealed to the county hearings officer for a public hearing. OTHER PERMITS, FEES, AND RESTRICTIONS: This approval does not remove or affect covenants or restrictions imposed on the subject property by deed or other instrument. The proposed use may require permits and/or fees from other local, State or Federal agencies. This decision does not take the place of, or relieve the responsibility for, obtaining other permits or satisfying any restrictions or conditions thereon. It is recommended that the agencies mentioned in Finding # 6 below be contacted to identify restrictions or necessary permits. The applicant is advised of the following: 15. The applicants should contact the Stayton Fire District to obtain a copy of the District’s Recommended Building Access and Premise Identification regulations and the Marion County Fire Code Applications Guide. Fire District access standards may be more restrictive than County standards. APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regula- tions the Director must condition or deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the Director's decision may request that the application be considered by a Marion County hearings officer after a public hearing. The applicant may also request reconsideration (one time only and a fee of $200) on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension of the 150-day time limit for review of zoning applications. A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Requests for reconsideration, or consideration by a hearings officer, must be in writing (form available from the Planning Division) and received in the Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Rd. NE, Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on November 1st, 2024. If you have questions about this decision, contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective November 4th, 2024, unless further consideration is requested. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. l. The subject property is designated Public in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan. The major purpose of this designation and the corresponding P (Public) zone is to provide regulations governing the development of lands appropriate for specific public and semi-public uses and to ensure their compatibility with adjacent uses. It is intended that this zone be applied to individual parcels shown to be an appropriate location for a certain public or semi-public use. If the use existing at the time the P zone is applied is discontinued or if a proposed use is not established, it is the intent that the land be rezoned to conform to surrounding zoning or be devoted to permitted uses. It is not intended that a property zoned public for one type of use be allowed to change without demonstrating that the proposed conditional use will be compatible with adjacent uses and the property is better suited to the proposed use than alternative locations. A proposed property line adjustment decision in 1998 (LLA98-034) included a determination about the number and size of legal parcels comprising the Elkhorn golf course and surrounding area that was part of a never implemented Planned Unit Development. The primary subject parcel in this decision (tax lot 401) was determined to be legal, as well as tax lot 200. The subject area is therefore legal for land use purposes.