HO Decision (532) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • construction, citing State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 206 P3d 1042 (2009) and PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12, 859 P2d 1143 1993). However, ORS 174.020 obligates a court to consider proffered legislative history only when the text of a statute is not capable of only one meaning. State v. Gaines at 173. See also, ORS 174.010 and ORS 174.020. ORS 174.010 provides (in relevant part) that the in the construction of a statute, the office of the judge is simply to ascertain and declare what is, in terms or in substance, contained therein, not to insert what has been omitted, or to omit what has been inserted. The definition of"Owner" in Measure 49, as specified in ORS 195.300(18) provides: (a) The owner of fee title to the property as shown in the deed records of the county where the property is located; (b) The purchaser under a land sale contract, if there is a recorded land sale contract in force for the property; or (c) If the property is owned by the trustee of a revocable trust, the settlor of a revocable trust, except that when the trust becomes irrevocable only the trustee is the owner. (emphasis added) The Oregon Uniform Trust Code under ORS 130.010(2) defines a beneficiary as a person that (a) has a present or future beneficial interest in a trust, whether vested or contingent; or (b) holds a power of appointment over trust property in a capacity other than that of trustee. Under the terms of the restated Trust that was submitted by Applicant on March 17, 2022, the trust estate was to be divided into equal shares of the Trustor's children and lineal descendants of any deceased children. The Trust indicated the Trustor's children were Gretchen L. Rhyne and Justine C. Fogarty. While the Trust is revocable, the Beneficiaries do not have a real property interest in the Trust property because a beneficial interest in a revocable trust is not usually considered a property interest. Tseng v. Tseng, 271 Or App 657, 667 (2015). When Mary Ruhl Dodds died on October 12, 2008, the Trust became irrevocable. ORS 130.730 provides "...the interests of a beneficiary under a revocable or irrevocable trust vest when the trust becomes irrevocable..." When the Trust became irrevocable, the Beneficiary's interest vested. Applicant correctly states that a vested interest is a real interest in property. A vested interest in the subject property gave the beneficiaries the right to receive the property interest. However, upon the death of Mary Ruhl Dodds, the trust became 13 Case No. AR 21-038 — ORDER Fogarty