Laserfiche WebLink
(4) A conclusion that an exception area is irrevocably committed shall be supported by <br />findings of fact that address all applicable factors of section (6) of this rule and by a <br />statement of reasons explaining why the facts support the conclusion that uses allowed by <br />the applicable goal are impracticable in the exception area. <br />(5) Findings of fact and a statement of reasons that land subject to an exception is irrevocably <br />committed need not be prepared for each individual parcel in the exception area. Lands <br />that are found to be irrevocably committed under this rule may include physically <br />developed lands. <br />(6) Findings of fact for a committed exception shall address the following factors: <br />(a) Existing adjacent uses; <br />(b) Existing public facilities and services (water and sewer lines, etc.); <br />(c) Parcel size and ownership patterns of the exception area and adjacent lands: - <br />(A) Consideration of parcel size and ownership patterns under subsection (6)(c) of this <br />rule shall include an analysis of how the existing development pattern came about <br />and whether findings against the goals were made at the time of partitioning or <br />subdivision. Past land divisions made without Application of the goals do not in <br />themselves demonstrate irrevocable commitment of the exception area. Only if <br />development (e.g., physical improvements such as roads and underground <br />facilities) on the resulting parcels or other factors makes unsuitable their resource <br />use or the resource use of nearby lands can the parcels be considered to be <br />irrevocably committed. Resource and non -resource parcels created and uses <br />approved pursuant to the applicable goals shall not be used to justify a committed <br />exception. For example, the presence of several parcels created for nonfarm <br />dwellings or an intensive commercial agricultural operation under the provisions <br />of an exclusive farm use zone cannot be used to justify a committed exception for <br />the subject parcels or land adjoining those parcels. <br />(B) Existing parcel sizes and contiguous ownerships shall be considered together in <br />relation to the land's actual use. For example, several contiguous undeveloped <br />parcels (including parcels separated only , by a road or highway) under one <br />ownership shall be considered as one farm or forest operation. The mere fact that <br />small parcels exist does not in itself constitute irrevocable commitment. Small <br />parcels in separate ownerships are more likely to be irrevocably committed if the <br />parcels are developed, clustered in a large group or clustered around a road <br />designed to serve these parcels. Small parcels in separate ownerships are not likely <br />to be irrevocably committed if they stand alone amidst larger farm or forest <br />operations, or are buffered from such operations; <br />(d) Neighborhood and regional characteristics; <br />(e) Natural or man-made features or other impediments separating the exception area from <br />adjacent resource land. Such features or impediments include but are not limited to <br />roads, watercourses, utility lines, easements, or rights -of -way that effectively impede <br />practicable resource use of all or part of the exception area; <br />(f) Physical development according to OAR 660-004-0025; and <br />(g) Other relevant factors. <br />(7) The evidence submitted to support any committed exception shall, at a minimum, include <br />a current map or aerial photograph that shows the exception area and adjoining lands, and <br />Exhibit A - Findings Case No. CP/ZC 21-005 5 <br />4864-0600-7078, v. 3 <br />