Ord 1446 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

acre 'home site' parcels, leaving the remaining 77.60 acres vacant for farm use (the "Farm Parcel"). 6. After the Application was initially submitted, the Applicant revised its' development plan, reducing the proposed homesites from the initial four (4) residential parcels to a proposed three (3) rural residential parcels (measuring approximately 2.80 acres, 2.36 acres, and 2.13 acres in size) (the "Homesites"), and increasing the size of the remnant Farm Parcel to approximately 78.31 acres. 7. Applicant modified its request to reflect this change. Applicant is now requesting the application of two (2) independent Goal 3 Exception Areas (the "Exception Areas"). The first would be applied to the three (3) proposed homesites to facilitate the development of parcels that are too constrained to be practicably farmed. The second would be applied to the Farm Parcel to allow Applicant to consolidate the farmable area in a sub-80-acre parcel (78.31 acres, representing an acreage reduction below the minimum 80 acres by 1.69 acres). Applicant is also requesting a zone change and corresponding comprehensive plan amendment for only the Homesites. The Farm Parcel will continue to be zoned EFU and designated for agricultural use, while the Homesites will be zoned AR and designated for residential use. 8. Marion County Public Works Land Development and Engineering Permits (LDEP) added the following advisories to be included in the land use case: ENGINEERING ADVISORIES A. PW Engineering has no action items for the proposed Zone Change itself B. The following items are noted for future reference: • Enchanted View Lane is a private easement not maintained by Marion County. Recording of a Road Maintenance Agreement will be required in conjunction with platting. • ODOT has jurisdiction over Enchanted Way with regards to the access connection with Enchanted View Lane, and utility work therein. • Transportation System Development Charges will be assessed at the time of Application for Building Permits Prior to the board's hearing DLCD responded with letters addressing the Application. All other agencies contacted either failed to respond or stated no objection to the proposal. DLCD wrote two Letters, one concerning the alternative Reasons exception, which the Applicant has since dropped and is not pursuing. The other letter related to the irrevocably committed exception, which the Applicant, and these findings, address below. 9. Don Lulay is the President of the Enchanted Ridge Property Owners' Association. Mr. Lulay and his wife live in the neighborhood. Mr. Lulay testified regarding the uniqueness of the Property. Mr. Lulay addressed that the original landowner, Mr. Updegrave, wanted twenty three (23) two -to -five -acre parcels to maintain the "farm character" of the Property. Mr. Lulay testified that the development of the three (3) residential parcels would allow the neighborhood to have the financial viability to protect the Farm Parcel from development. Mr. Lulay also Exhibit A - Findings Case No. CP/ZC 21-005 2 4864-0600-7078, v. 3