Staff Decision (3875) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

parties, the description of the adjusted line, references to original recorded documents and signatures of all parties with proper acknowledgment. The deeds convevina the re -Matted parcels shall be recorded after the recording of the re -plat. Marion County Assessor's Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. Marion County Building Inspection commented that a Site Evaluation will be required for Parcel 1 septic. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. All contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. 7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. These criteria are as follows: (a) When one or more parcels subject to a proposed lot line adjustment are larger than the minimum parcel size pursuant to MCC136.090(A)(1), the same number of parcels shall be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all parcels subject to the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no parcel shall be reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. (b) If the minimum parcel size in MCC136.090(A)(1), is larger than 80 acres, and a parcel subject to lot line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the parcel shall not be reduced in size through lot line adjustment to less than 80 acres. (c) Any lot line adjustment shall result in a configuration of parcels that are at least as suitable for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. (a) When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the minimum parcel size pursuant to MCC 17.136.090(A)(1), the same number of lots or parcels shall be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than the minimum parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not apply to those lots or parcels. (b) If the minimum parcel size in MCC 17.136.090(A)(1) is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. (c) Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. (d) A property line adjustment may not be used to: 1. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; 2. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger that the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; or 3. Allow an area of land used to qual fy a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be used to qual another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an acreage standard Any property line adjustment that results in an existing dwelling being located on a dferent parcel shall not be subject to the standards in MCC 17.136.030(A) so long as the adjustment: 1. Does not increase the any adverse impacts on the continued practice of commercial agriculture on the resulting parcels; and 2. Does not increase the potential number of dwellings on the resulting parcels. (e)