BOC DECISION (644) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

They are suited to locations near.commercial office and retail zones and along collector and arterial streets. Applicants propose multi -family dwellings on a lot. .The subject property is in an SACP'designated RM area. Water; sewer and other urban services are available to the site.. No commercial zones directly abut the subject property but commercial services are available on Silverton Road to the south. Silverton Road is an arterial street that is accessed by 45t' Avenue, a collector street. Provided applicants develop the subject property in accordance with development regulations,.their request will be consistent with the RM zone purpose statement.and MCC 16.3M 50(C) will be met. 7.. .,More intensive zoning. The RM zone is the most intensive zone consistent with the Multi --Family Residential SACP designation. The RM zone allows the same types of uses as the RL zone except that the RL.zone allows single family dwellings. RM zoned properties are to the north -and west. UD zoned land is to the east and south. A single-family, dwelling partitioning was approved on UD zoned property across Blueberry Lane to the south even though the property is designated. Multi --Family Residential. The property designation put those owners on.warning that higher density zoning on surrounding lands was likely -and. that the use would become nonconforming when RM zoning is applied. A duplex is on the UD zoned property directly east and is consistent with RM zoning. -RS (Single -Family Residential) property to the east and southeast are insulated from the subject property by intervening UD zoned property and the 45th. Avenue right-of-way. RM zone development standards.(setbacks,.landscaping, etc.) will buffer uses allowed in the zone from adjacent lower density residential uses -The proposed zone will not allow uses that will significantly adversely affect allowed uses on adjacent properties zoned for less intensive uses. MCC 16.39.050(D) is satisfied. ADJUSTMENTS S. Applicant asks for two adjustments; one to increase .the number of residences allowed on a private roadway from four to six dwelling units and one to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a four --plea from eight,spaces to six spaces.' 9. Under MCC 16.41.030; development standards in the applicable zone and development requirements in MCC chapter 16.24. and chapters 16.26 through 16.34 protect the public health, safety and welfare by establishing stari.dard setbacks., maximum building heights and other development standards.that apply to various uses. For lands or uses with unique characteristics, the intent and purpose of the, development standards may be maintained while allowing for minimal adjustments to quantifiable requirements. The. following criteria shall be used to review and decide adjustment applications: