Decision (225) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

established, in exception areas approved under ORS 197.732, or in an acknowledged urban growth boundary. (b)Adequate fire protection and other rural services are, or will be, available when the use is established; (c) The use will not have a significant adverse impact on watersheds, groundwater, fish and wildlife habitat, soil and slope stability, air and water quality; (d)Any noise associated with the use will not have a significant adverse impact on nearby land uses; a.The use will not have a significant adverse impact on potential water impoundments identified in the comprehensive plan, and not create significant conflicts with operations included in the comprehensive plan inventory of significant mineral an aggregate sites. 14. As outlined above, there is no evidence to indicate that the use will have a negative impact on nearby lands devoted to farm use. The applicants indicate that the proposed use will generate customers needing services for work performed in the existing dwelling. In conjunction with the issuance of residential building permit, the County previously required the property owner to file a Declaratory Statement recorded with the County Clerk to serve as a reminder that there are farm operations nearby and that a compatible relationship is necessary to promote continuation of these activities. The Declaratory Statement is recorded for the property and also applies to this home occupation. The proposal meets 13(a). 15. The Salem Suburban Fire District serves the parcel, and all other needed services are currently available to the site. The proposal satisfies the criterion in 13(b). 16. The property is not within a wildlife habitat area or geologically hazardous area. There is no evidence of significant odors or noxious matter emitted from the premises that would affect air or water quality. It appears that the operation will generate little or no noise heard off the property. The proposal meets 13(c) and (d). 17. There are no potential water impoundments or significant mineral and aggregate sites identified by the Comprehensive Plan in the area. The criterion in 13(e) is met. 18. Based on the above discussion, the applicants’ request meets, or can be conditioned to meet, all applicable criteria for granting a home occupation within a SA zone. The APPROVED proposal is, therefore, . Sterling Anderson Date: 9/22/09 Director-Planning Division If you have any questions please contact David Epling, Senior Planner at 588-5038.