My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Decision (3109)
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
Old Cases
>
Staff Decision (3109)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2023 4:22:09 PM
Creation date
10/30/2024 3:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
07-047
Document_Date
6/29/2007
Land Use Type
Partition
Tax_Lot_Number
071E07D 01100
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
3000 SEIMOLE RD NE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a. The minimum size of the lots and maximum density of the area to be developed shall be <br />consistent with those established in the adopted comprehensive plan. <br />b. When appropriate, a sketch plan be filed with the commission which encourages orderly urban <br />growth, showing future streets, road alignments, and redivision of the subject property. <br />c. The proposed land divisions be consistent with the general nature of the area. <br />d. Justification be shown for divisions having a density more than that adopted on the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />e. Division will not create urban farm conflicts. <br />25. The proposed parcels will be at least 1 acres in size; consistent with the comprehensive plan. As <br />described above, the nature of the area consists of existing rural residential homesites and the proposed <br />division and non -farm dwellings should not have a significant impact on surrounding farm uses. The <br />proposal meets the criteria in 24. <br />26. The current Chapter 172.56 of the MCRZO provides standards for access to the newly created parcels, <br />which were not waived by the county: <br />All lots must have a minimum of 20 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way, or, when an access <br />easement is proposed to serve one or more lots in any partitioning, the location and improvement of the <br />roadway access shall conform to the following standards which are necessary for adequate access for <br />emergency vehicles. Evidence that the access has been improved to these standards shall be provided <br />prior to the issuance of building permits on the parcels served by the access easement. <br />(a) Have a minimum easement width of 20 feet; <br />(b) Have a maximum grade of 12%; <br />(c) Be improved with an all-weather surface with a minimum width of 12 feet; <br />(d) Provide adequate sight -distance at intersections with public roadways; <br />(e) Be provided with a road name sign at the public roadway as an identification for emergency <br />vehicles in accordance with the Marion County Address and Street Name Ordinance. <br />27. The applicants are proposing an access easement to serve the three new parcels. The requirements in <br />Chapter 172.56 can be made a condition of any approval. On the submitted site plan, the applicants <br />indicated that access to the west and south parcels would be via an easement to be established. Under <br />the provisions in the Marion County Address and Street Name Ordinance, the easement must be named <br />and the properties must be addressed from the roadway. A list of names was submitted to the 911 <br />Dispatch center for review and a name will be selected for the roadway name. Prior to the recording of <br />the plat, a work order for the street sign installation, with appropriate fee, must be submitted to Marion <br />County Department of Public Works. <br />28. The Measure 37 Case #06-69 approving waivers for the proposed partitioning did not waive the <br />requirements for placement of a non -farm dwelling listed in 139.070. These standards are as follows: <br />(a) Special Siting Requirements: <br />(1) <br />Dwellings and structures shall comply with the special requirements in (2) or (3). Com- <br />pliance with the provisions in (2) and Section 139.070 (b), (f) and (g) satisfies the criteria <br />in (3) below. Alternative sites that meet the criteria in (3) may be approved as provided in <br />Section 110.680. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.