Laserfiche WebLink
conflicts and interpretative issues that arise out of these frequently overlapping and occasionally <br /> inconsistent regulations. <br /> This application merely implements the county's prior approvals of the Elkhorn Valley Estates <br /> subdivision and related goal exceptions in 1982. The applicant has elected to demonstrate compliance <br /> with subsequently adopted rules regarding exceptions to Goals 11 and 14 and the Board finds that the <br /> approval criteria for such exceptions has been met. An exception to Goal 4 was previously approved <br /> by the county and subsequently acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development <br /> Commission("LCDC") as part of the conceptual approval in 1982. The county's approval of these <br /> goal exceptions under the applicable state statutes and rules authorize the proposed development <br /> despite the fact that the amendments would otherwise conflict with the goals. <br /> In these findings, applicable standards and criteria are set forth in bold-face headings and/or italicized <br /> type followed by the county's findings including facts, reasons and legal conclusions. These findings <br /> are organized so that the analysis begins with state law and proceeds to local law. Thus, the next <br /> section deals with state statutes and their implementing administrative rules, followed by a section <br /> addressing the Statewide Planning Goals and their implementing administrative rules, and a section <br /> addressing the standards for goal exceptions. Those sections are followed by sections addressing <br /> applicable standards and criteria from the county comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. Often the <br /> same or similar criteria are found in more than one source. These findings attempt to minimize <br /> repetition and redundancy, using cross-references where possible and adding or repeating material only <br /> where necessary. <br /> VII. STATE STATUTES <br /> A. ORS 197.610 and 197.615—Post-acknowledgement Amendments <br /> ORS 197.610(1) and OAR 660-018-0020 require the county to forward a proposal to amend its <br /> acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulations to the DLCD director at least 45 days prior <br /> to the initial hearing. The county sent the requisite notice of the proposed amendments to DLCD on <br /> November 16, 2007. DLCD participated in the proceedings and submitted a letter regarding the <br /> application. <br /> After final approval and adoption of amendments to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation, <br /> ORS 197.615(1) and OAR 660-018-0040 require the county to submit a copy of the text of the <br /> amendment and supporting findings to DLCD within five business days after the final decision is <br /> adopted. The county must also provide notice of the adopted amendment to persons who participated <br /> in the local proceedings and requested in writing that they be provided such notice. The county will <br /> comply with these requirements upon final adoption of these findings. <br /> B. ORS 197.712(2)(g)—Economic Development Obligation <br /> This statute requires the county to provide "reasonable opportunities to satisfy local and rural needs for <br /> residential and industrial development and other economic activities on appropriate lands outside urban <br /> growth boundaries, in a manner consistent with conservation of the state's agricultural and forest land <br /> bases." The fact that this subdivision is consistent with this purpose is demonstrated by the findings <br /> addressing Goal 9 in Section VIII.I of these findings, and by the findings justifying an exception to <br /> Goal 14 in Section IX below. <br /> -4- <br />