BOC Decision (37) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It is not clear from Kishpaugh or ORS 92.017 just what process is required to vacate property lines, but it seems clear that a formal vacation order by the county court is sufficient. Parcels containing the subject property were conveyed by metes and bounds descriptions rather than block oriented descriptions. Conveying property by metes and bounds description may be enough, by itself, to vacate property lines. Property lines may be vacated by other than a formal vacation action. In Koo v. Polk County, 33 Or LUBA 487 (1997) and Van Veldhuisen v. Marion County, 26 Or LUBA 468 (1994), LUBA found that recording a partition plat showing formerly separate lots as one parcel vacates property lines. In DLCD v. Polk County, 33 Or LUBA 30 (1997), Polk County had a policy that conveying previously separate parcels by a single perimeter metes and bounds description vacated lot lines between the properties. Polk County later adopted a new policy that conveyance by a single metes and bounds description did not vacate lines between parcels. DLCD favored Polk County's original policy, and appealed a decision finding in favor of separate parcels. LUBA did not reach the merits of the case, finding that DLCD had no standing to appeal, leaving open the question of whether perimeter property descriptions vacate property lines within the perimeter. Local jurisdictions are left to determine how property lines are vacated. Marion County codes do not address the matter and ¡m interpretation of ORS 92.017 is necessary. It is clear that a vacation order and a new plat will suffice to erase old lot lines. Lots that can be described by block and lot are generally described that way. Describing previously separate parcels in one deed, wi th one perimeter property description indicates that one parcel is being conveyed. While not as clear cut as a replat, a single property description is an indication of intent to convey and accept one parcel of land. It is hereby found that conveying previously separate parcels by a single metes and bounds description is a specific process to eliminate property lines under ORS 92.017. This especially makes sense here where conveyances were made without regard to block or road lines or descriptions. Even if the block lines for blocks 16, 17, 23 and 24 survived the plat vacation, the lines were vacated when properties were conveyed by metes and bounds descriptions. 10. The 1918 conveyance to McDonald established the northern and eastern boundary of tax lot 100. The 1951 conveyance to McDonald vacated the lot lines established in the 1882 conveyance to Delorme. The 1969 conveyance to Phill ips established the property lines bordering 4 2W 19AD 900, 1000 and 1100. Block 27 was excluded by that transaction, and block 26 was excluded by a later transaction. According to testimony at hearing, the land to the ADM-01-o2\ORDER - 10 SMITH