City of Salem
Ballot Title:
A Measure Proposing Annexation Of 3.36 Acres Of Property
Question:
Summary: Approval of this measure would annex 3.36 acres of property located east of Wallace Road NW, North of the intersection of Lynda Lane NW and Wallace Road NW to the City of Salem. The property is within the Urban Growth Boundary. Upon annexation, the property would be zoned City of Salem RA (Residential Agriculture).
Explanatory Statement:
The property proposed for annexation is generally located east of Wallace Road NW and north of Lynda Lane NW. The entire property is located within the Urban Growth Boundary, and is designated in the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan as "Multi-Family Residential." Zoning of the property if annexed into the City would be RA (Residential Agriculture). RA zoning would typically permit agricultural activities and single family residential land uses. The multi-family comprehensive plan designation could enable the zoning to be changed to multiple family zoning in the future.
Development of property is not required at the time of annexation. When development occurs, it must conform to the zoning designation that is in effect at the time of development. The zoning of any property may be changed from time to time following notice and public hearing as required by law.
This annexation was requested by petition of the property owner. The annexation would place the property within the City of Salem, subject to the City’s tax rates.
If annexed, the property would be withdrawn from the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District and would thereafter receive fire and other services from the City of Salem.
Additional information and land use findings regarding the proposed annexation are contained in the staff reports dated July 31, 2000 and August 7, 2000. Copies of the staff reports are available for public review at the Salem Public Library, and at the Salem City Hall, Department of Community Development, 555 Liberty Street SE, Salem, Oregon.
Submitted by:
City of Salem,
Department of Community Development
No arguments opposed to this measure were filed. |